
But the country that prides itself on racial mixing and tolerance is also being forced to take a reality check.
Here's our one "real" black senator:
Micaal wrote:mac are u suggesting brazil has more black politicians in power then US ?
brazil has more blacks who are involved in influencing public decision in brazil?
or your being specific to this article??
What I'm saying is that it's interesteing how the authors of articles like these always wind up calling "white", in Brazil, people whom they'd never call "white" in the States.
Now, I'm pretty sure Tuma and Souto consider themselves to be "white". But if it became politically expedient for them to do so, they could call themselves "pardo" at the drop of a hat and no one would challenge it.
I don't know what Magno Malta and Heloisa Helena clal themselves, but again, they can obviously go either way as the political winds take them.
This is the problem with American analyses of Brazilian race: Americans presume that people are "really" black or white. There's no question about it in their eyes.
Here in Brazil, however, we have a lot of people who are brown, even in the top ranks of government. Where do these folks get slotted it?
It's indicative of me that the author of the Sentinel piece doesn't seem to know himself, being that in one part of the article he uses "black and brown" as a synonym for "black" while in another part of the article, he quotes stats which only make sense if we were to presume that "black" does NOT include brown.
Macunaima wrote:Micaal wrote:mac are u suggesting brazil has more black politicians in power then US ?
brazil has more blacks who are involved in influencing public decision in brazil?
or your being specific to this article??
What I'm saying is that it's interesteing how the authors of articles like these always wind up calling "white", in Brazil, people whom they'd never call "white" in the States.
Now, I'm pretty sure Tuma and Souto consider themselves to be "white". But if it became politically expedient for them to do so, they could call themselves "pardo" at the drop of a hat and no one would challenge it.
I don't know what Magno Malta and Heloisa Helena clal themselves, but again, they can obviously go either way as the political winds take them.
This is the problem with American analyses of Brazilian race: Americans presume that people are "really" black or white. There's no question about it in their eyes.
Here in Brazil, however, we have a lot of people who are brown, even in the top ranks of government. Where do these folks get slotted it?
It's indicative of me that the author of the Sentinel piece doesn't seem to know himself, being that in one part of the article he uses "black and brown" as a synonym for "black" while in another part of the article, he quotes stats which only make sense if we were to presume that "black" does NOT include brown.
Macunaima wrote:But the country that prides itself on racial mixing and tolerance is also being forced to take a reality check.
Yet again, another (presumably white) gringo author arrives to tell us what we have known since the 1970s at least: Brazil is a racist country. The only people who need to "wake up" here are the folks who think that this is news.
However, the article is a classic example of how to twist Brazilian racial realities.
For example, the author claims that 50% of Brazil is black. That's only tru if you count all "pardos" as "black". If we only count "negros" it's 6%.
But fair go, right? Wrong. Because in all the other stats he cites, he uses stats that are concocted by only counting that 6% of self-described "negros". Frex, that 3% of college grads only pertains to the 6% negro population, not to the 50% pardo and negro population. Likewise, that "1 out of 81 sentators is black" bit only counts self-described negros, not pardos.
Finally, that 'blacks only started organizing in the last 40 years" is TOTAL horseshit. Quoting AfroReggae on Black Brazilian political history is like quoting FlavorFlav on Black American political history: you're sure to get good sounsbites, but they're not going to be all that reliable in terms of facts.
Not to try to moralize our Senate which is, of course, a racist institution, but to claim that the U.S. is somehow light-years beyond Brazil on this issue is nuts. Here's our one "real" black senator:
...and here are a bunch of Brazilian senators who The Sentinel obviously considers to be "white":
Now let's look at Black American sentaors, shall we?
In the last ten years, there has been precisely ONE: Barack Obama. And you know DAMNED well that there are no mestiços in that august body passing as white.
So which country needs to wake up again...?
Yet again, another (presumably white) gringo author arrives to tell us what we have known since the 1970s at least: Brazil is a racist country.
99% of the brazilian media and the popular mentality still claims that there is no racism in Brazil, onlt class division. Even though some "know" that is bull. The problem here Mac, is that you're so blindly anti-US that it makes you forget your pro-black militancy.For example, the author claims that 50% of Brazil is black. That's only tru if you count all "pardos" as "black". If we only count "negros" it's 6%.
But fair go, right? Wrong. Because in all the other stats he cites, he uses stats that are concocted by only counting that 6% of self-described "negros". Frex, that 3% of college grads only pertains to the 6% negro population, not to the 50% pardo and negro population. Likewise, that "1 out of 81 sentators is black" bit only counts self-described negros, not pardos.
Not to try to moralize our Senate which is, of course, a racist institution, but to claim that the U.S. is somehow light-years beyond Brazil on this issue is nuts. Here's our one "real" black senator:
Micaal wrote:MacWhat I'm saying is that it's interesteing how the authors of articles like these always wind up calling "white", in Brazil, people whom they'd never call "white" in the States.
Now, I'm pretty sure Tuma and Souto consider themselves to be "white". But if it became politically expedient for them to do so, they could call themselves "pardo" at the drop of a hat and no one would challenge it.
I don't know what Magno Malta and Heloisa Helena clal themselves, but again, they can obviously go either way as the political winds take them.
This is the problem with American analyses of Brazilian race: Americans presume that people are "really" black or white. There's no question about it in their eyes.
Here in Brazil, however, we have a lot of people who are brown, even in the top ranks of government. Where do these folks get slotted it?
It's indicative of me that the author of the Sentinel piece doesn't seem to know himself, being that in one part of the article he uses "black and brown" as a synonym for "black" while in another part of the article, he quotes stats which only make sense if we were to presume that "black" does NOT include brown.
_________________
some of those writters maybe doing it out of respect to that regions definition of what race is
or could be culture ignorance in lots of cases..
Their are lots of brazilians who consider themselves white in brazil, but carry strong indian latin/hispanic features,
in which would be consider any of those elsewhere
and thats where the problem is with outsiders looking in at brazilians
along with brazilians leaving to US/Europe/Asia etc then moving back
to latin-america with their feelings hurt.
(if race looks is an issue with them)
None of the people in those images look of the Indo-European of the Caucasus region, so why would any of them consider or suggest their white?
is this a mental state of many brazilians to uplift the self confidence....?
a advantage to benefit the brazilian society?
is this a mental state of many brazilians to uplift the self confidence....?
a advantage to benefit the brazilian society?
Micaal wrote:are u mad?..lol u mad com?..ahahahaah
dawg!! how is that?......well let me say this ..
those latin actors/actresses u mentioned consider themselves latino....not me not america they do!! go hit their websites read their bio
(except that slavic girl never seen her don't know who she is)
i didn't say brazil or other countries don't have whites.
people derived from a origin of an area or earlier form is what i mean with those people in the photo
and please don't call me or any other person narrow minded it is about decant fool or brazilians wouldn't call all asians japas no matter what ..even if their second generation born brazilians so please da f**k outa here with that.,,shit do braZilians even call japas from out of town gringos??is this a mental state of many brazilians to uplift the self confidence....?
a advantage to benefit the brazilian society?
answer that shit homeboy!! or ill make it simple..so u wont take it outa text
in brazil what is it looks or orgin that defines who and what you are?
i see people that look like my mother, sister calling themselves all these names everything under the sun other then black ..lol..that doest happend in other countries...so thats why i ask how does brazil base who is if so why?
im negro,white. mixed ..pardo etc cause i look like this?
or im this cause of my family or ancestral descent
awg!! how is that?......well let me say this ..
those latin actors/actresses u mentioned consider themselves latino....not me not america they do!! go hit their websites read their bio
(except that slavic girl never seen her don't know who she is)
is this a mental state of many brazilians to uplift the self confidence....?
a advantage to benefit the brazilian society?
in brazil what is it looks or orgin that defines who and what you are?
i see people that look like my mother, sister calling themselves all these names everything under the sun other then black ..lol..that doest happend in other countries...so thats why i ask how does brazil base who is if so why?
frank4000 wrote:everybody what to classify themselves as something else
Comandante wrote:frank4000 wrote:everybody what to classify themselves as something else
That's extremely ignorant. You're basically saying that all the humans in the planet earth want to change their race/ethnicity.
Hey, but that's Frank, as ignorant as a Christmas tree.![]()
What do you even bother posting in serious topics? Go back to the Prostitute Section. Let's keep this one half-intelligent.
Thanks in advance.
Macunaima wrote:It's indicative of me that the author of the Sentinel piece doesn't seem to know himself, being that in one part of the article he uses "black and brown" as a synonym for "black" while in another part of the article, he quotes stats which only make sense if we were to presume that "black" does NOT include brown.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests